Frequently Asked Questions

Find your answers

FAQs

  • How the 1-3kg payload UAV works for?

    A Because Leap1 coaxial dual-rotor UAV has a payload of 1.5-3 kilograms, it is usually used to attack high-value targets such as enemy military facilities, military vehicles, aircraft, large drones, and large formations of troops. Furthermore, because the LEAP1 coaxial dual-rotor UAV can be carried by a single soldier, it is more maneuverable and can hide better, making it difficult for enemy high-value targets to ensure their own safety once deployed. The Leap1 coaxial dual-rotor UAV combines maneuverability, high payload, cost-effectiveness, and intelligent guidance, making it suitable for large-scale deployment, carried by individual soldiers and used for distributed operations by groups of soldiers. In this type of battlefield situation, heavy enemy equipment may face remote saturation attacks from numerous small squads of soldiers within a radius of 10 kilometers.

  • why Leap 1 UAV is affordable?

    Leap1 CH01 is made by batch production with up to 1K PCS per day.

  • Question: What is the difference between the Leap1 coaxial multirotor UAV and a traditional coaxial multirotor UAV with cyclic pitch?

    A: The Leap1 coaxial multirotor UAV is designed differently from a traditional coaxial multirotor UAV with cyclic pitch.

    A traditional coaxial multirotor UAV with cyclic pitch has fixed-pitch blades, while the Leap1 coaxial multirotor UAV has variable-pitch blades that can be adjusted to meet different flight requirements.

    Additionally, the Leap1 coaxial multirotor UAV uses radial-tilt technology, which tilts the blades at a certain angle to control the direction and magnitude of thrust by adjusting the blade angle. This design provides higher lift and stability with lower vibration and noise levels compared to traditional coaxial multirotor UAVs.

    Therefore, the Leap1 coaxial multirotor UAV offers greater flexibility and control performance than traditional cyclic pitch coaxial multirotor UAVs, making it particularly suitable for tasks requiring quick response and precise control.

  • Is leap1 the right choice for soldiers in mobility

    A Leap1 features a compact and lightweight design that allows it to operate in confined spaces and maneuver through tight areas with ease. It also boasts high stability and control due to its coaxial rotor configuration, which provides efficient airflow and cancels out rotor torque. The drone has a maximum payload capacity of up to 4 kg and can fly for up to 35 minutes on a single charge, making it suitable for a wide range of tasks.

    Other factors that may influence the suitability of the Leap1 or any other drone for a particular application include its operating range, flight speed, camera quality, and software capabilities. Therefore, when selecting a drone, it is important to carefully evaluate your specific needs and requirements, as well as the strengths and weaknesses of the available options, before making a decision.

  • According to quadcopter drones, what is advantage of Coaxial multirotor drones?

    A The advantages of Coaxial multirotor drones include:

    • Higher lift and greater stability due to their propulsion system, which makes them more suitable for high-load transportation and allows them to carry heavier payloads or fly for longer periods.
    • Greater energy efficiency during flight because the thrust vector is closer to perpendicular to the direction of flight. The coaxial design of the rotors reduces the torque effect, which makes them easier to control.
    • Lower noise level than quadcopter drones, making them more suitable in environments where noise pollution is a concern.
    • Suitable for use in harsh weather conditions due to their superior stability and control.
  • Could you provide me more data to show the advantages?

    Yes, there are several key parameters that can be used to compare the advantages of Coaxial multirotor drones vs quadcopter drones:

    • Lift capacity: The lift capacity of a drone is the maximum weight it can carry while still maintaining stable flight. Coaxial multirotor drones typically have a higher lift capacity than quadcopter drones due to their more efficient propulsion system. For a Leap1 CH01 of 4.5kg net weight, we offer max payload of 3Kg.
    • Stability: Stability is an important parameter for drones, as it ensures safe and predictable flight. Coaxial multirotor drones are generally considered to be more stable than quadcopter drones due to their opposing rotor design, which reduces rotational force and decreases the likelihood of unwanted movement.
    • Energy efficiency: The energy efficiency of a drone determines how long it can fly before requiring recharging or refueling. Coaxial multirotor drones are generally more energy-efficient than quadcopter drones due to their coaxial rotor design, which reduces turbulence and air resistance, resulting in less power consumption.
    • Noise level: Noise pollution is a concern in many applications, such as in urban or residential areas. Coaxial multirotor drones generate less noise than quadcopter drones due to their lower blade tip speed, making them more suitable for use in noise-sensitive environments. For leap1 CH-01, you might not notice the noise 80 meters away. 
    • Weather resistance: Drones must be able to operate safely in adverse weather conditions such as high winds, rain, or snow. Coaxial multirotor drones are generally considered to be more resistant to adverse weather conditions than quadcopter drones due to their greater stability and control. Leap1 CH01 is designed for mobility in the constant wind speed of 15 m/s.
  • Why the anxil multirotors UAV is much higher performance of left and stability

    A Coaxial multirotor UAVs are generally considered to have higher performance in terms of lift and stability compared to other types of multirotor UAVs due to their unique coaxial rotor configuration.

    In a coaxial design, two rotors are mounted one above the other on the same vertical axis, with the upper rotor spinning clockwise and the lower rotor spinning counterclockwise. This arrangement allows for more efficient airflow over the rotors, resulting in greater lift capacity and stability compared to traditional quadcopter designs, which only have four rotors arranged in a square or X-shaped configuration.

    Because of the opposing rotation of the coaxial rotors, they inherently cancel each other’s torque, which results in less rotational force on the drone and makes it easier to control. Additionally, coaxial multirotor UAVs typically have a shorter overall length than quadcopters, making them more maneuverable and allowing them to operate in confined spaces.

    Overall, the coaxial rotor configuration provides several advantages over other types of multirotor UAVs, including increased lift capacity, greater stability, improved control, and increased maneuverability. These advantages make coaxial multirotor UAVs well-suited for applications such as aerial photography, search and rescue, and surveillance, where high performance and precise control are essential.

TOP